Age Is Not the Problem. Ageism Is.

Why the stories our culture tells about growing older begin shaping us long before we get there; and why it’s never too early, or too late, to push back.

There is a phrase that appears near the close of the Australian Human Rights Commission’s 2021 national report on ageism: “Age isn’t the problem. Ageism is.” It is deceptively simple. And backed by a growing body of research, it is also widely supported.

This article is a companion to When the World Stops Seeing You, which explored the links between ageism, depression, and the experience of social invisibility in midlife and later life. Here, we step back to examine a broader question: where does internalised ageism actually begin, and what can we do about it?

The answer, it turns out, is earlier than most people expect. Research and national survey data consistently show that ageist attitudes begin shaping people’s self-concept well before old age — in their 30s and 40s, sometimes earlier. If you are approaching midlife, this article is as much for you as it is for people already in later life. The psychological groundwork we lay now — how we understand ageing, what stories we absorb about our own futures — matters enormously for what comes next.

And the distinction between age and ageism is not semantic. It has real psychological consequences. Understanding it clearly is one of the most protective things any of us can do.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is ageism and how does it affect mental health? Ageism refers to stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination based on a person's age. A widespread review of the peer reviewed literature across 45 countries found that ageism was linked to worse outcomes across 11 health domains: including reduced longevity, poor mental health, cognitive impairment, and exclusion from healthcare (WHO, 2021). In Australia, the AHRC's 2025 report The Age Barrier found that age-based discrimination remains widespread and often unrecognised in health settings, with significant consequences for wellbeing (AHRC, 2025).

Does ageism only affect older people? No. Research shows ageist attitudes begin shaping self-concept from childhood — and that people in their 30s and 40s are significantly affected. The AHRC's 2021 national survey found 68% of young adults aged 18–39 reported being affected by ageist attitudes in the past five years — slightly more than the 64% of older adults who reported the same.

What is internalised ageism? Internalised or self-directed ageism occurs when people absorb negative cultural messages about ageing and turn them against themselves. Research shows this is the most damaging form of ageism for health outcomes. A 2026 study in Behavioural Sciences found that people who perceived greater ageism reported lower life satisfaction, higher rates of depression, anxiety and stress, poorer self-care, and greater risk of cognitive decline (MDPI, 2026).

Can internalised ageism be changed? Yes. A 2025 study in Ageing & Mental Health found that a six-week 'Reimagine Aging' intervention using education and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) produced meaningful shifts in the ageing narratives of older adults, indicating that new more balanced perspectives of ageing can be found (Ageing & Mental Health, 2025).

What Does the Research Actually Show About Ageism?

Is ageism the most socially accepted form of prejudice?

The AHRC's What's Age Got to Do with It? (2021) report surveyed 2,440 Australians and found that 90% agreed ageism exists in this country. Over half believed that making jokes about age is more socially acceptable than making jokes about race or gender. Two-thirds felt ageism affected people across the entire lifespan and not only older people.

The report identified ageism as operating through three layers: (1) stereotypes (how we think); (2) prejudice (how we feel); and (3) discrimination (how we act). All three are woven into Australian institutions, including healthcare, workplaces, media, and the legal system.

In November 2025, the AHRC released a new report: The Age Barrier: Older Adults' Experiences of Ageism in Health Care, drawing on focus groups, interviews, and a comprehensive literature review. The report found that age-based discrimination remains widespread and often unrecognised, with significant consequences for wellbeing. With one in six Australians now over 65, the findings make clear that ageism is deeply embedded across health systems and requires urgent attention. Older patients described feeling dismissed, spoken over, or treated as "just a number", with attitudes leading to missed diagnoses, poorer health outcomes, and people avoiding care altogether.

The consequences are not trivial. The AHRC found ageism is associated with poorer physical, mental, and cognitive health outcomes. In particular, for older people, ageism is associated with increased social isolation, reduced quality of life, and greater financial insecurity (AHRC, 2025). An estimated 6.3 million cases of depression globally are attributed to ageism (Ayalon et al., 2020), and in the United States alone, a Yale School of Public Health study found that the one-year cost of ageism was $63 billion (or $1 USD in every $7 USD spent on the eight most expensive health conditions among Americans aged 60+.

One of the starkest findings concerns the cumulative toll of internalised ageism. Evidence cited by the AHRC found that when individuals in later life take on ageist attitudes about themselves, this is associated with an average estimated loss of 7.5 years of life, alongside poorer health outcomes and greater risk of social isolation (AHRC, 2025). This indicates that the stories we absorb about ageing are both psychological and physiological.

How Early Does Ageism Begin to Shape Us?

Here is what is perhaps the most important finding for people approaching midlife: ageism does not wait until we are old to affect us. Research shows that ageism is internalised from the early childhood as a result of socialisation and cultural learning processes. Research shows that children as young as three already associate older age with physical decline, dependence, and passivity, even while viewing older people warmly in other respects (Flamion et al., 2020; Seefeldt et al., 1977).

The AHRC's survey found that 68% of young adults (aged 18–39) reported being affected by ageist attitudes in the past five years'; slightly more than the 64% of older adults who reported the same. This suggests that ageism shapes experience throughout adult life, not only in its later stages.

Middle-aged Australians (aged 40–61 in the survey) were the group most likely to have been turned down for a job because of their age, with 35% reporting this experience. They also described navigating the pressure of a traditional life trajectory charcaterised by expectations that certain milestones should be achieved at particular ages, and the shame when life doesn't align with that script.

Critically, the AHRC found that young adults are the most likely age group to hold negative views about their own cohort, and about themselves. They are also the most likely to stereotype others based on age. The report's interpretation is significant: it indicates that people tend to become more positive about their age group, and about ageing itself, as they get older. Prejudice tends to soften with lived experience.

Why Is Self-Directed Ageism the Most Harmful Kind?

Among the three manifestations of ageism (institutional, interpersonal, and self-directed) the association between ageism and health outcomes is strongest for self-directed ageism, that is, when ageism is turned against oneself. This supports stereotype embodiment theory (Levy, 2009), which maintains that lifetime exposure to negative age stereotypes leads to the internalisation of ageism as negative attitudes towards one's own ageing, adversely affecting health and wellbeing in old age.

In a 2026 study published in Behavioural Sciences, based on a sample of 1,047 adults across three age cohorts, five predictors of a positive self-perception of ageing were identified: (1) lower perceived age discrimination; (2) a generally positive attitudinal profile; (3) endorsement of benevolent rather than hostile stereotypes; (4) absence of hostile ageism; and (5) belonging to the 65–75 age group rather than the 76+ group. In other words, how we think about ageing, and how much discrimination we perceive, matters as much as our age itself.

Strong links exist between self-directed ageism and health. Eliminating ageism therefore requires an integrated perspective — and intervention efforts must also target older people themselves.

Can Ageist Attitudes Actually Be Changed?

Yes. And this is where the research becomes genuinely hopeful.

Recent Australian Human Rights Commission research from 2023 shows that a brief, one-off ageism workshop can be a powerful tool in creating positive changes in attitudes and behaviours toward older people. The Commission's research evaluated the effectiveness of a single 2.5-hour interactive educational session in reducing ageist attitudes among workers in aged care and community settings — with positive results immediately afterwards and also at the 2–3 month follow-up.

A six-week 'Reimagine Aging' program combining education, Acceptance Commitment Therapy, and attributional retraining produced significantly more positive self-perceptions of ageing in older adults, with large effect sizes maintained at two-month follow-up (Murphy et al., 2025a). A companion study found qualitative shifts in how participants described their ageing selves, replacing narratives focused on loss and ageism with values-focused ones (Murphy et al., 2025b).

What Can You Do About Ageism — Starting Now?

1. Notice the stories you've already absorbed

Most of us have internalised ageist messages without realising it. Common ones include: I'm too old to start something new. My best years are behind me. Nobody is interested in what I have to say anymore. These are not facts, they’re narratives, shaped by culture, media, and accumulated experience. Noticing them is the first step to questioning them.

2. Seek out counter-narratives deliberately

The AHRC's 2024 Shaping Perceptions report examined how ageing and older people are portrayed in Australian media, highlighting the structural factors contributing to negative narratives. The antidote is intentional exposure to different stories — people in midlife and later life who are reinventing, creating, contributing, and thriving. They exist in abundance. They are just underrepresented in mainstream media.

3. Separate age from ageism in your own self-talk

When you notice yourself thinking something negative about your own ageing, ask: is this about age or about ageism? Is this a biological reality, or a cultural story I’ve been handed? The distinction is not always easy to make. But asking the question creates space that didn't exist before.

4. Consider whether therapy might help

If ageist narratives have become deeply embedded, shaping how you see yourself, limiting what you believe is possible, contributing to depression, anxiety, or a loss of purpose, this is where evidence-based psychological therapy, including Acceptance Commitment Therapy and values-based approaches can be explored (see Murphy et al., 2025a, 2025b).

Ready to Explore?

At Upside Stories, we work with individuals from midlife and beyond, using online therapy and evidence-based approaches to help them examine internalised beliefs about ageing, explore meaning and future possibility, and focus on the psychological foundations that support wellbeing across the lifespan.

To discuss your online therapy needs, book a free 20-minute consultation. We’d love to hear from you.

Book now

References

Australian Human Rights Commission. (2021). What's age got to do with it? A snapshot of ageism across the Australian lifespan.https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/age-discrimination/publications/whats-age-got-do-it-snapshot-ageism-across-australian-lifespa

Australian Human Rights Commission. (2023). Changing perspectives: Testing an ageism intervention.https://humanrights.gov.au/changingperspectives

Australian Human Rights Commission. (2024). Shaping perceptions: How Australian media reports on ageing.https://humanrights.gov.au

Australian Human Rights Commission. (2025). Breaking the age barrier: Transforming age attitudes in health care.https://humanrights.gov.au/resource-hub/by-resource-type/projects2/older-peoples-rights/breaking-the-age-barrier-transforming-age-attitudes-in-health-care

Ayalon, L., et al. (2020). Global reach of ageism on older persons' health: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0220857. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220857

Burnes, D., Sheppard, C., Henderson, C. R., Wassel, M., Cope, R., Barber, C., & Pillemer, K. (2019). Interventions to reduce ageism against older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 109(8), e1–e9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305123

Fang, M. L., Canham, S. L., Battersby, L., Sixsmith, J., Wada, M., & Sixsmith, A. (2019). Exploring privilege in the digital divide: Implications for theory, policy, and practice. The Gerontologist, 59(1), e1–e15. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny037

Flamion, A., Missotten, P., Jennotte, L., Hody, N., & Adam, S. (2020). Old age-related stereotypes of preschool children. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 807. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00807

Henry, J. D., et al. (2024). Breaking the links between ageism and health: An integrated perspective. Ageing Research Reviews.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2024.102294

Ishikawa, M. (2023). Internalization of negative societal views on old age into self-perceptions of aging: Exploring factors associated with self-directed ageism. Frontiers in Sociology.https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.129132

Levy, B. R. (2009). Stereotype embodiment: A psychosocial approach to aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(6), 332–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01662.x

Levy, B. R., Chang, E-S., Kannoth, S., & Wang, S-Y. (2020). Ageism amplifies cost and prevalence of health conditions. The Gerontologist, 60(1), 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny131

Levy, B. R., Slade, M. D., Kunkel, S. R., & Kasl, S. V. (2002). Longevity increased by positive self-perceptions of aging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.261

MDPI Behavioural Sciences. (2026). Ageism and self-perception of ageing: Psychosocial predictors of attitudes towards ageing. Behavioural Sciences, 16(4), 527. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16040527

Murphy, D. J., Mackenzie, C. S., Porter, M. M., & Chipperfield, J. G. (2025a). Reimagine Aging: A process-based intervention to decrease internalised ageism. Clinical Gerontologist, 48(4), 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2024.2355539

Murphy, D. J., et al. (2025b). Changes in narratives about aging among older adults in an internalised ageism intervention. Ageing & Mental Health, 29(11), 2058–2066. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2025.2521367

National Seniors Australia. (2021). Elements of ageism 1: Assessing older Australians' experience of everyday ageism. https://nationalseniors.com.au/research/ageism/elements-of-ageism-1

Reyes, B., et al. (2025). Changes in narratives about aging among older adults in an internalised ageism intervention. Ageing & Mental Health, 29(11), 2058–2066. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2025.2521367

Seefeldt, C., Jantz, R. K., Galper, A., & Serock, K. (1977). Using pictures to explore children's attitudes toward the elderly. The Gerontologist, 17(6), 506–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/17.6.506

World Health Organization. (2021). Global report on ageism.https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240016866